跳过正文

Field Experiment

The Minimal Effects of Making Local News Free: Evidence from a Field Experiment

JOP 88/3 pp. 998-1010 2026-07-01 Original The Minimal Effects of Making Local News Free: Evidence from a Field Experiment Andrew Trexler Abstract (原文未提供摘要) 中文 让地方新闻免费的最小效应:来自实地实验的证据 Andrew Trexler 摘要 原文未提供摘要 关键词 地方新闻、免费访问、实地实验、媒体效应、新闻消费 DOI: 10.1086/735872

Varieties of Participation and Investment in Local Public Goods: Evidence from an RCT in Kenya

JOP — 2026-04-01 Original Varieties of Participation and Investment in Local Public Goods: Evidence from an RCT in Kenya Tara Grillos, Michael Touchton Abstract (原文未提供摘要) 中文 参与形式的多样性与地方公共品投资:来自肯尼亚随机对照试验的证据

The Effects of Exposure to New Electoral Rules: Field Experimental Evidence from Sierra Leone

APSR — pp. 1-20 2026-03-23 Original The Effects of Exposure to New Electoral Rules: Field Experimental Evidence from Sierra Leone AVI AHUJA, GWYNETH MCCLENDON Abstract How do electoral rules influence voters? We build on existing research that has examined voter, rather than elite, reactions to electoral rules and implement a field experiment around a switch from single-member plurality rules to multi-member closed-list proportional rules (PR) in Sierra Leone, expanding the study of electoral rules’ influence on voters further into the Global South. We find that exposure to multimember district/PR increased women’s commitment to voting and decreased both men’s and women’s support for particularistic campaign appeals in this context. These results likely flow from voters’ perceptions of whether politicians are accountable to parties or to voters under different systems, rather than from increased party competition, new party entry, a clear switch to programmatic party competition, or increased trust in elections. We discuss the implications for studying electoral rules in clientelistic democracies.

Encouraging crossover voting in the 2024 presidential primary

AJPS — 2026-03-11 Original Encouraging crossover voting in the 2024 presidential primary Hayley M. Cohen, Daniel B. Markovits Abstract Abstract Will voters participate in the primary of a party they oppose to prevent the nomination of a candidate they fear? Partnering with a political action committee, we conduct a first‐of‐its‐kind, large, preregistered field experiment ( N = 83,902) in the lead‐up to the 2024 Republican presidential primary in New Hampshire. A specialized get‐out‐the‐vote intervention increases turnout in the Republican primary among undeclared voters who are modeled as likely to vote for Democratic candidates in the general election. Our treatment increased Republican primary turnout in this sample by 1.6 percentage points while reducing turnout in the Democratic Primary by .5 percentage points. Supplementing our experiment with surveys before and after the primary, we estimate that each vote cast by Democratic‐leaning voters in the Republican primary had between a 78% and 95% probability of supporting the relatively moderate Republican primary candidate. We argue that voters are capable of sophisticated, risk‐mitigating behavior in primaries.