PSJ 54/3 2026-08-14
Original Contested Rule Formation Under Institutional Mismatch: A Framework for Early‐Phase Governance of Disruptive Innovations
PAR — 2026-08-13
Original The Gendered Path of Least Resistance: First Entry and Exit Behaviors of Public and Nonprofit Employees
Tiana Marrese, Ying Liu, Femida Handy
PNAS 123/33 pp. e2603437123-e2603437123 2026-08-12 Original The relationship between officer misconduct and convictionless arrests
Bocar A. Ba, Nayoung Rim, Roman Rivera
Abstract
This paper examines whether officers with high prior alleged misconduct are more likely to make convictionless arrests (arrests that result in no or dismissed charges or where the defendant is found not guilty). Using the Chicago Police Department's rotational duty calendar to obtain plausibly exogenous variation in the set of officers assigned to work on a particular day, we find that high-misconduct officers make statistically significantly more arrests for nonindex crimes and in situations involving high officer discretion, compared to their no-misconduct peers. Our findings also suggest that downstream legal actors, such as prosecutors and judges, may be partially "correcting" these arrests.
PMR — pp. 1-25 2026-08-12 Original Should we stay or should we go? Implications of trust in the municipality for second-generation migrants’ behavioural intentions towards the municipality
JPART — 2026-08-11
Original Institutional amnesia and public administration: does history repeat?
Alastair Stark, Hridesh Gajural, Jack Corbett, Dennis C Grube, Heather Lovell, Rodney J Scott
PMR — pp. 1-29 2026-08-11 Original Citizens’ support for behavioural public policy and trust in government: evidence from two online experiments
Paolo Belardinelli, Martin Lodge
Abstract
We explore citizens’ support for behavioral interventions by distinguishing interventions that exploit citizens’ bounded rationality through choice architecture (Nudge) from those that challenge bounded rationality by promoting reflection through deliberative forums (Think). We also examine the role of trust in government in shaping these preferences. Findings from two experiments involving 3,010 US participants show that citizens are more willing to support Think rather than Nudge. Whereas the adoption of Nudge, as compared to Think, does not seem to influence trust in government, encouraging higher levels of trust in government has a stronger effect on support for Nudge than for Think.
PAR — 2026-08-10
Original Putting Democratic Theory and Principles of Justice in the Right Place: Ethical Pluralism in Collaborative and Participatory Governance
Alexander L. Q. Chen‐Florea
PAR — 2026-08-10
Original Public Service Delegation and the Mechanisms of Blame Attribution: Evidence From a Survey Experiment on Public Service Failure
Oscar Nowlan
GOV 39/4 2026-08-08
Original The Bureaucratic Paradox of Citizen Agency: Institutional Crowding‐Out in Government‐Catalyzed Co‐Production in Shanghai, China
PA — 2026-08-08
Original Getting the Priorities Straight: Public Values in AI Adoption
Jinke M. Oostvogel, Matthew Young, Bram Klievink
Abstract
ABSTRACT Artificial Intelligence (AI) is adopted in public organizations as a transformative innovation, yet how value prioritizations unfold in AI adoption processes remains underexplored. Therefore, we ask: How do public values unfold in AI adoption processes in public organizations? We conducted a qualitative case study of an AI adoption process at the radiology department of a Dutch academic hospital after the decision to adopt is made and before implementation, using ethnographic fieldwork, interviews, and document analysis. Our findings highlight how public values and the AI adoption process are balanced in the transition from the initiation to the implementation stage. We find a recursive relationship between public values and the AI adoption process. We show an interplay of instrumental and intrinsic values. We highlight the importance of top‐down adoption decisions for how public values are perceived, and we show the importance of public organizations ensuring public values are safeguarded in public‐private partnerships.