JOP — 2026-05-18
Original Cadre networks and bureaucratic careers in autocracies
Alexander De Juan, Felix Haass, Jan H. Pierskalla
Abstract
(原文未提供摘要)
中文 威权政体中的干部网络与官僚职业生涯
Alexander De Juan, Felix Haass, Jan H. Pierskalla
PA — 2026-05-12
Original Fairness Perception, Administrative Burden, and Social Welfare Participation
Yongdong Shen, Wenchi Wei, Chao An, Zhouyi Chen
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study examines whether and how fairness perception and administration burden relate to citizen participation in social welfare programs. We theoretically argue that both participation costs and citizens' perceptions of distributive fairness play critical roles in determining individuals' willingness to engage with welfare programs. We further propose that compliance burden (costs) may constrain frontline officials' discretion in benefit allocation, thereby reinforcing perceptions of fairness and encouraging program participation. Using a nationally representative sample from the China Urban and Rural Low‐Income Household Survey, we find that perceived unfairness is negatively associated with welfare participation, and administrative burdens constitute substantial barriers to access. Moreover, compliance burden weakens the negative correlation between perceived unfairness and welfare participation, suggesting that rigid procedures are linked with stronger perceptions of distributive fairness and institutional trust. These findings underscore the complex interplay between procedural design and citizen perceptions in shaping welfare participation in China.
PAR — 2026-05-11
Original Seeking Legitimacy Through Accountability: Is Institution‐Based Accountability More Legitimate Than Campaign‐Based Accountability?
CQ 266 pp. 309-324 2026-05-11 Original Ideology Without Unity: The Rhizomatic Logic of Xi Jinping Thought
Jean Christopher Mittelstaedt
Abstract
Abstract This article reconceptualizes Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics (Xi Thought hereafter) not as a coherent doctrine but as a rhizomatic ideological formation. Drawing on the work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, it treats Xi Thought as a configuration in which coherence is not presupposed but produced through the continual recombining of fragments across institutional sites. Based on an analysis of official publications, including collected works, excerpt volumes and study readers, the article shows how Xi’s speeches are disassembled and reassembled across domains such as law, economy, diplomacy and culture. These recompositions render ideology modular and resilient, allowing elements to be activated, re-weighted or sidelined without destabilizing the system as a whole. The article further argues that ideological coherence is generated through distributed and compulsory participation by Party and state actors, who are required to embed fragments of Xi Thought into institutional practice. Conceptualizing Xi Thought as a rhizome shifts analysis from doctrinal meaning to the operational logic through which ideology acquires administrative force within the Chinese party-state.
PMR — pp. 1-25 2026-05-11 Original Do third parties matter for citizens’ public programme participation? Evidence from an administrative burden perspective
CQ 266 pp. 481-490 2026-05-11 Original Discovering Controversies through Reversions: A Text-based Analysis of China’s Two-phase Bill Changes
Jiying Jiang
JCC — pp. 1-16 2026-05-07 Original A Risk-Centered Approach to Data Privacy: Interpreting the Birth of China’s Personal Information Protection Law
GOV 39/3 2026-04-29
Original Health and Climate Risks: Can Policy Attention Persistence Enhance the Resilience of Aging Societies?
Lulin Xu, Zhenhao Ma, Ge Xin
JCC — pp. 1-19 2026-04-29 Original Divergent Pathways to “Digital China”: Unveiling Provincial Digital Agendas Under Top-Level Design
JCC — pp. 1-15 2026-04-24 Original Dual Authoritative Mediation: Policing and Community Governance in Urban China
Gang Tian, Wen-Hsuan Tsai
Abstract
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is employing mechanisms inspired by the ‘Fengqiao experience’ to mediate grassroots conflicts. Our findings show that in urban areas, community support officers from the People’s Police have played a critical role in this task. They liaise with residents’ committees and other relevant units to conduct ‘dual authoritative mediation’. This practice reflects the roles of the police as holders of state authority and paternal figures in the community, and it promotes the deep penetration of state power into grassroots communities. The role of the police in mediating disputes between residents is highly valued by the CCP, and China’s police force has been given more responsibility with respect to politics and law and the maintenance of stability than police in other countries.