Original
Peasants and Parliaments: Institutional Foundations of Agrarian Reform in Eighteenth-Century Eastern Europe
Abstract
abstract: An influential literature attributes Europe’s economic precocity to what might be termed “good” institutions, such as representative assemblies, which shielded property from governmental predation. This account fails to contend with the diversity of property rights in preindustrial Europe, many of which, like serfdom, were obstacles to growth. The author proposes a role for some—but not all—early representative assemblies in fostering growth by eliminating these “bad” property rights. An assembly’s capacity to extinguish property rights is a product of its decision-making efficiency, which in turn is associated with majority voting and centralized agenda control. The author tests these claims through a controlled comparison of progrowth agrarian reforms in the Russian Baltic province of Livonia and the Danish-ruled duchies of Schleswig and Holstein between 1795 and 1805, finding that the Livonian diet’s efficient organization was key to the successful transformation of serfdom. This analysis suggests that we must evaluate preindustrial representative institutions on the basis of their capacity to orchestrate complex exchanges of property rights and rents.
中文
农民与议会:十八世纪东欧农业改革的制度基础
摘要
一支有影响力的文献将欧洲的经济早熟归因于所谓“良好”制度,如代议制议会,它们使财产免受政府的掠夺。这一解释未能处理前工业时代欧洲财产权的多样性,其中许多财产权(如农奴制)是增长的障碍。作者提出,一些——而非所有——早期代议制议会在通过消除这些“坏”财产权来促进增长方面发挥了作用。议会废除财产权的能力取决于其决策效率,而决策效率又与多数投票和集中化的议程控制相关。作者通过对1795年至1805年间俄罗斯波罗的海利沃尼亚省以及丹麦统治的石勒苏益格和荷尔斯泰因公国促进增长的农业改革进行受控比较,检验了这些主张,发现利沃尼亚议会的有效组织是成功改造农奴制的关键。这一分析表明,我们必须根据前工业时代代议制机构组织复杂的财产权和地租交换的能力来评价它们。
关键词
代议制议会、农业改革、农奴制、财产权、制度基础、东欧、利沃尼亚、石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因