Original
A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Rules for Nuanced Analysis of Governance Systems
Abstract
ABSTRACT Understanding how institutions shape collective action requires analytical tools that capture the complexity of governance arrangements. Ostrom's typology of rules provides a foundational framework for examining institutional configurations, yet limited specificity in rule types reduces its effectiveness in comparative analysis. To address this, we present a detailed classification of the seven rule types into subtypes, enhancing the study of institutional diversity and structure. Based on the initial description of the seven rule types, a systematic review of scientific articles, an analysis of written regulations, and an internal mutual exclusivity check, we propose a taxonomy that expands the seven types into subtypes. Utilizing these detailed subtypes enables a more comprehensive characterization of institutional configurations, thereby strengthening comparisons of governance systems.
中文
面向治理系统精细化分析的综合规则分类体系
摘要
理解制度如何塑造集体行动，需要能够捕捉治理安排复杂性的分析工具。奥斯特罗姆的规则类型学为考察制度配置提供了基础性框架，但规则类型的具体性有限，削弱了其在比较分析中的有效性。为解决这一问题，我们提出将七种规则类型细分为子类型的详细分类，以促进对制度多样性与结构的研究。基于对七种规则类型的初始描述、对科学文章的系统综述、对成文法规的分析以及内部互斥性检查，我们提出一个将七种类型扩展为子类型的分类体系。运用这些细化的子类型，可以更全面地刻画制度配置，从而加强治理系统之间的比较。
关键词
规则类型学、治理系统、制度分析、奥斯特罗姆、制度多样性、集体行动、比较分析、规则分类体系