跳过正文
  1. 政治学英文顶刊消息速递/
  2. 论文时间线/

How Do Policy Narratives Evoke Emotions? An Appraisal‐Theoretic Approach

PSJ

2026-06-17

Original

How Do Policy Narratives Evoke Emotions? An Appraisal‐Theoretic Approach

Sonja Blum, Johanna Kuhlmann, Nora Habelitz

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on policy narratives acknowledges the crucial role that emotions play within communication and sense‐making. Especially the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) has placed emotion at the center of attention and stressed that affect‐imbued stories are key for how individuals make sense of the world and navigate through the policy process. Still, narrative scholars have only recently started to investigate emotions more thoroughly, and a systematic understanding of how policy narratives evoke distinct emotions—such as anger, fear, trust, or compassion—is lacking. How are emotions linked to different narrative elements, and how do they contribute to the emotional appeal of a narrative? In this perspectives note , we draw on appraisal theory from psychology to answer these questions: We argue that appraisal theory's emotion‐process components—such as goal relevance, agency, control, and norm congruence—map onto the structural elements of policy narratives identified by the NPF and can clarify how distinct emotions are evoked in policy narratives. We demonstrate the usefulness of an appraisal‐informed NPF by focusing on the emotion of anger and illustrating how anger‐driven policy narratives can be empirically analyzed.

中文

政策叙事如何唤起情绪?一种评价理论路径

Sonja Blum, Johanna Kuhlmann, Nora Habelitz

摘要

政策叙事研究承认情绪在传播与意义建构中发挥关键作用。尤其是叙事政策框架(NPF)将情绪置于关注中心,并强调充满情感的叙事对于个体如何理解世界、如何在政策过程中行动至关重要。然而,叙事学者直到最近才开始更深入地考察情绪,对于政策叙事如何唤起诸如愤怒、恐惧、信任或同情等不同情绪,仍缺乏系统性理解。情绪如何与不同的叙事要素相联系?它们又如何促成叙事的情绪吸引力?在这篇观点性短文中,我们借鉴心理学的评价理论来回答这些问题:我们认为,评价理论的情绪过程成分——如目标相关性、能动性、控制和规范一致性——与NPF所识别的政策叙事结构要素相对应,并能够阐明政策叙事如何唤起不同情绪。我们聚焦愤怒这一情绪,并展示如何对愤怒驱动的政策叙事进行实证分析,从而说明受评价理论启发的NPF的用处。

关键词

政策叙事、叙事政策框架、情绪、评价理论、愤怒、政策过程