跳过正文
  1. 政治学英文顶刊消息速递/
  2. 论文时间线/

How Can Researchers Have Greater Policy Impact?

PSJ

2026-04-17

Original

How Can Researchers Have Greater Policy Impact?

Kizzy Gandy

Abstract

ABSTRACT Researchers seeking public policy impact lack consistent, coherent, and practical definitions, strategies, and measurement approaches. This article addresses these gaps through four questions using literature, practitioner expertise, and real‐world examples. What does it mean to have policy impact? Three levels of impact are defined: contributing to new policy conversations; shaping policy narrative direction; and influencing decisions that create, reform, or stop policies. How does research influence policy? Research and policy interact bi‐directionally and iteratively. Strategies to maximize the supply, demand, and co‐production of research in policymaking are operationalized for both individual researchers and research organizations. How can the impact of research on policy be evaluated? Contribution analysis is the most appropriate approach because it goes beyond simple correlations—revealing how and why evidence was used in policymaking, guiding future influencing strategies. How can researchers achieve greater policy impact? While each researcher and research organization should develop their own theory of change to inform an effective and testable impact strategy for their operating context, four generalizable principles are presented with a case study demonstration.

中文

研究者如何产生更大的政策影响?

Kizzy Gandy

摘要

寻求公共政策影响的研究者缺乏一致、连贯且实用的定义、策略和测量方法。本文通过四个问题,结合文献、从业者专业知识和现实案例来弥补这些空白。何为具有政策影响?本文界定了三个影响层次:促进新的政策对话;塑造政策叙事的走向;以及影响那些制定、改革或终止政策的决策。研究如何影响政策?研究与政策以双向和迭代的方式互动。本文针对个体研究者和研究组织,具体化了在政策制定中最大化研究的供给、需求和共同生产策略。如何评估研究对政策的影响?贡献分析是最合适的方法,因为它超越了简单的相关性——揭示证据如何以及为何被用于政策制定,并指导未来的影响策略。研究者如何实现更大的政策影响?尽管每位研究者和研究组织都应制定自己的变革理论,以形成适合其运作情境的有效且可检验的影响策略,本文提出四条可推广的原则,并以案例研究予以示范。

关键词

政策影响、研究利用、贡献分析、循证政策、研究-政策互动、政策制定、影响评估、变革理论