跳过正文
  1. 政治学英文顶刊消息速递/
  2. 论文时间线/

Personality pairing improves human–AI collaboration

PNAS 123/35 pp. e2530627123-e2530627123 2026-08-28

Original

Personality pairing improves human–AI collaboration

Harang Ju, Sinan Aral

Abstract

Here we examine how AI agent "personalities" interact with human personalities to shape human-AI collaboration and performance. In a large-scale, preregistered randomized experiment, we paired 1,258 participants with AI agents prompted to exhibit varying levels of the Big Five personality traits. These human-AI teams produced 7,266 display ads for a real think tank, which we evaluated using 1,168 independent human raters, and a field experiment on X that generated nearly 5 million impressions. We found that human and AI personalities individually shaped ad quality and teamwork and that human-AI personality pairings directly influenced ad quality. For example, extraverted humans paired with conscientious AI produced the lowest quality ads, followed by conscientious humans paired with agreeable AI and neurotic humans paired with conscientious AI. In the field experiment, ad quality significantly influenced ad performance, measured by click-through rates and cost-per-click. Together, these results demonstrate that personality pairing can improve human-AI collaboration and performance. They also motivate future research on the complex implications of AI personalization for human-AI collaboration, teamwork, and performance.

中文

人格配对改善人机协作

Harang Ju, Sinan Aral

摘要

本文考察AI智能体的“人格”如何与人的性格相互作用,从而塑造人机协作与绩效。在一项大规模、预注册的随机实验中,我们将1258名参与者与经提示表现出不同水平大五人格特质的AI智能体配对。这些人机团队为一家真实智库制作了7266条展示广告,我们使用1168名独立人类评分者对其进行评估,并在X上进行了一项产生近500万次展示的现场实验。我们发现,人和AI的人格分别塑造了广告质量和团队合作,且人机人格配对直接影响广告质量。例如,外向的人与尽责的AI配对产生的广告质量最低,其次是尽责的人与宜人的AI配对,以及神经质的人与尽责的AI配对。在现场实验中,广告质量显著影响广告绩效,其以点击率和每次点击成本衡量。总之,这些结果表明,人格配对可以改善人机协作与绩效。它们也推动未来研究关注AI个性化对人机协作、团队合作和绩效的复杂影响。

关键词

人机协作、人格配对、大五人格、AI智能体、随机实验、广告质量、团队绩效、AI个性化