Original
The contested nature of New Public Governance as a third governance model
Abstract
This article examines New Public Governance (NPG), emphasizing the underexposed role of the national state. Focusing on Dutch labour market policy, it draws on document analysis and (group) interviews with 74 public and private stakeholders across national and subnational levels. While NPG principles are evident in network composition and collaboration, interaction between policymaking and implementation remains limited, indicating weak NPG diffusion. A longitudinal analysis over more than a decade, reveals structural barriers to interactive decision-making and performance enhancement. The findings point to a multifaceted form of state steering that generates divergent institutional arrangements and shifting power dynamics, with significant implications for governance and policymaking processes.
中文
作为第三种治理模式的新公共治理的争议性本质
摘要
本文考察新公共治理(NPG),强调民族国家未被充分展现的作用。聚焦荷兰劳动力市场政策,基于文献分析以及对国家和次国家层面74位公私部门利益相关者的(小组)访谈。尽管NPG原则在网络构成与协作中显而易见,政策制定与执行之间的互动仍然有限,表明NPG扩散较弱。对十余年的纵向分析揭示了互动式决策和绩效提升面临的结构性障碍。研究发现指向一种多面向的国家引导形式,其产生分化的制度安排和不断变化的权力动态,并对治理与政策制定过程具有重要意涵。
关键词
新公共治理、国家作用、荷兰劳动力市场政策、网络治理、政策执行、绩效提升、国家引导、制度安排