Original
The “Professional Mortality” Problem in Early City Management: A Study of Organized Denial
Abstract
ABSTRACT The early city management profession experienced appalling rates of attrition. This problem of “professional mortality” had been clearly recognized by the end of World War I: causes of attrition included threats and violence against managers, intense political interference in managers' work, and interpersonal missteps. Yet the organized management profession and advocates of the manager plan actively ignored threats and were unwilling to respond collectively or officially to political interference; leading scholars recognized but did not publicly discuss common interpersonal problems faced by managers. This silence on the underlying causes of turnover marked an effort to protect the manager plan's viability in the face of growing electoral opposition during the 1920s, placing the interests of the profession above its practicing members. The optimistic, rationalist discourses of advocates, scholars, and professional leaders rested on self‐conscious denial of uncomfortable realities; a full historical accounting may help avoid repeating these mistakes.
中文
早期城市管理中的“职业死亡率”问题:一项关于组织性否认的研究
摘要
早期城市管理职业经历了惊人的流失率。这一“职业死亡率”问题在第一次世界大战结束时已被明确认识到:流失的原因包括对管理者的威胁和暴力、对管理者工作的强烈政治干预,以及人际交往中的失误。然而,有组织的管理职业和经理制的倡导者却积极忽视威胁,不愿对政治干预作出集体或正式回应;知名学者认识到管理者面临的常见人际问题,却未公开讨论。这种对人员更替深层原因的沉默,标志着在20世纪20年代选举反对日益增长的情况下,为保护经理制的可行性而作出的努力,将职业利益置于其执业成员之上。倡导者、学者和职业领袖的乐观理性主义话语,建立在自觉否认令人不安的现实之上;完整的历史清算可能有助于避免重蹈覆辙。
关键词
城市管理、职业死亡率、人员流失、组织性否认、城市经理制、市政改革、公共行政史