跳过正文
  1. 政治学英文顶刊消息速递/
  2. 论文时间线/

Regulatory Offsetting Schemes as Effective Governmental Self‐Binding Device? Lessons From the German Experience

PAR 86/5 pp. 1407-1419 2026-03-11

Original

Regulatory Offsetting Schemes as Effective Governmental Self‐Binding Device? Lessons From the German Experience

Xavier Fernández‐i‐Marín, Markus Hinterleitner, Christoph Knill, Yves Steinebach

Abstract

ABSTRACT Governments in advanced democracies often implement self‐binding mechanisms like regulatory offsetting schemes to counteract short‐term political incentives. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of Germany's offsetting scheme by analyzing over 3000 legal acts for restrictive clauses and passages related to replacing or repealing existing regulations. Despite Germany being a “least likely” case for failure, our analysis indicates that the scheme has not reduced regulatory burdens. These findings suggest that self‐binding measures struggle to override political incentives for rule production, especially with inadequate monitoring. We contribute to the literature by systematically assessing governmental self‐binding effectiveness, introducing a novel methodological approach based on large language models, and employing a robust difference‐in‐differences design to estimate counterfactual effects. Our study highlights the challenges of implementing effective self‐binding mechanisms in democratic governance.

中文

监管抵消机制能否成为有效的政府自我约束工具?——来自德国的经验教训

Xavier Fernández‐i‐Marín, Markus Hinterleitner, Christoph Knill, Yves Steinebach

摘要

发达民主国家的政府常常实施诸如监管抵消机制之类的自我约束机制,以抵消短期政治激励。本文通过分析3000多部法律法案中与替换或废止现行法规相关的限制性条款和段落,评估德国抵消机制的有效性。尽管德国是失败可能性最小的案例,我们的分析表明,该机制并未减少监管负担。这些发现表明,自我约束措施难以压过规则生产中的政治激励,尤其是在监督不足的情况下。我们通过系统评估政府自我约束的有效性、引入一种基于大语言模型的新方法论路径,并采用稳健的双重差分设计来估计反事实效应,为文献作出贡献。我们的研究凸显了在民主治理中实施有效自我约束机制所面临的挑战。

关键词

监管抵消机制、政府自我约束、监管负担、德国、大语言模型、双重差分、民主治理