Original
When Coproduction Meets Professionalism: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Challenges of Lay Input
Abstract
ABSTRACT Coproduction is an established element in public service provision, linked to positive outcomes such as increased service quality and quantity. Realizing these outcomes requires skills and motivation from street‐level professionals and lay actors alike. Nevertheless, research has long questioned professionals' willingness to engage in coproduction because lay input challenges their professionalism. However, existing research often treats lay input as a uniform, challenging factor, overlooking the possibility that professionals may perceive it differently depending on the interaction. To respond to these challenges more effectively, the article develops a conceptual framework addressing the research question: When do street‐level professionals perceive lay input as a challenge to their professionalism? The article studies coproduction in the design phase, particularly the active input of clients in interactions with street‐level professionals. It identifies three key aspects of interactions that influence the extent to which lay input challenges professionalism: the type of, need for, and communication of lay input. Contrary to the existing literature, the findings highlight that different forms of input exist within interactions that vary in how much they challenge professionalism. These findings are based on an interpretive ethnographic study conducted in two Danish daycare centers, comprising 58 semi‐structured interviews with childcare professionals and parents and 42 days of participant observation. The case serves as an informative case due to the extensive coproduction related to core pedagogical matters. The article informs targeted professional training, managerial practices, and flexible policy frameworks that help professionals anticipate, interpret, and integrate lay input more effectively.
中文
当共同生产遇上专业性:迈向理解外行输入挑战的概念框架
摘要
共同生产是公共服务供给中的一个既定要素,与服务质量提高和数量增加等积极结果相关联。实现这些结果需要一线专业人员和非专业行动者双方都具备技能与动机。然而,研究长期以来一直质疑专业人员参与共同生产的意愿,因为外行输入会挑战其专业性。但是,现有研究往往将外行输入视为一种统一的、具有挑战性的因素,忽视了专业人员可能因互动情境不同而以不同方式感知它的可能性。为更有效地回应这些挑战,本文构建了一个概念框架,以回答以下研究问题:一线专业人员何时会将外行输入视为对其专业性的挑战?本文研究设计阶段的共同生产,特别是服务对象在与一线专业人员互动中的主动输入。它识别出影响外行输入在多大程度上挑战专业性的三个互动关键方面:外行输入的类型、需求与沟通方式。与现有文献相反,研究发现,互动中存在不同形式的输入,它们对专业性的挑战程度各不相同。这些发现基于在丹麦两家日托中心开展的解释性民族志研究,包括对儿童保育专业人员和家长进行的58次半结构化访谈以及42天的参与式观察。该案例之所以具有信息价值,是因为其围绕核心教育事务存在广泛的共同生产。本文为有针对性的专业培训、管理实践和灵活的政策框架提供参考,以帮助专业人员更有效地预判、解释并整合外行输入。
关键词
共同生产、专业性、外行输入、一线专业人员、解释性民族志、公共服务供给、概念框架