Original
The Institutional Sources of Economic Transformation: Explaining Variation in Energy Transitions
Abstract
Why are some governments more effective in promoting economic change than others? We develop a theory of the institutional sources of economic transformation. Institutions can facilitate transformation through two central mechanisms: insulation and compensation. The institutional sources of transformation vary across policy types, whether policies impose costs primarily on consumers (demand-side policies) or on producers (supply-side policies). Proportional electoral rules and strong welfare states facilitate demand-side policies, whereas autonomous bureaucracies and corporatist interest intermediation facilitate supply-side policies. We test our theory by leveraging the 1973 oil crisis, an exogenous shock that compelled policymakers to simultaneously pursue transformational change across industrialized countries. Evidence from the generalized synthetic control method, case studies, and discourse network analysis support our hypotheses. The findings have important implications for contemporary transformations, including climate change policy and low-carbon transitions.
中文
经济转型的制度性根源:解释能源转型的差异
摘要
为什么一些政府在推动经济变革方面比其他政府更有效?我们提出一种关于经济转型的制度性根源的理论。制度可以通过两个核心机制促进转型:隔离与补偿。转型的制度性根源因政策类型而异,具体取决于政策主要将成本施加于消费者(需求侧政策)还是生产者(供给侧政策)。比例选举规则和强福利国家促进需求侧政策,而自主官僚机构和法团主义利益中介促进供给侧政策。我们利用1973年石油危机来检验我们的理论;这一外生冲击迫使工业化国家的政策制定者同时追求转型性变革。来自广义合成控制方法、案例研究和话语网络分析的证据支持我们的假设。这些发现对当代转型具有重要意义,包括气候变化政策和低碳转型。
关键词
经济转型、能源转型、制度性根源、需求侧政策、供给侧政策、比较政治经济学、石油危机、广义合成控制法