Original
Still Instrumentally Inclusive
Abstract
Do individuals in Western democracies shift their views on LGBT+ inclusion when exposed to opposition from Muslim out-groups? And is this “homonationalist” responsiveness stronger among anti-immigration individuals? Our article “Instrumentally inclusive [...]” addressed these questions using representative data from Britain (Study 1) and crowd-sourced data from Spain (Study 2). We revisit Study 2 in response to concerns about post-stratification weighting a convenience sample and erroneously inconsistent use of robust standard errors. Varying population reference parameters, weight caps, variance estimators, subgroup definitions, and covariate adjustments, we find strong support for the original findings. Neither reasonable alternative weighting schemes nor corrected variance estimators substantively change the results. In fact, the originally published point estimates are equal to or smaller than the median across alternative specifications. Consistent with the Article, we find that treatment increases support for LGBT+ inclusion in Spain, without consistent identifiable variation by immigration attitudes.
中文
依然工具性包容
摘要
当西方民主国家的个体面对来自穆斯林外群体的反对时,他们是否会改变对LGBT+包容的看法?这种“同性民族主义”式的回应是否在反移民个体中更强?我们的文章《工具性包容[...]》使用来自英国的代表性数据(研究1)和来自西班牙的众包数据(研究2)回答了这些问题。针对有关对一个便利样本进行后分层加权以及不一致地错误使用稳健标准误的关切,我们重新审视了研究2。通过改变总体参照参数、权重上限、方差估计量、子群定义和协变量调整,我们发现原始发现得到有力支持。无论是合理的替代加权方案,还是校正后的方差估计量,都未实质改变结果。事实上,最初发表的点估计等于或小于各种替代设定下估计值的中位数。与原文章一致,我们发现处理提高了西班牙对LGBT+包容的支持,且未发现按移民态度存在一致可识别的差异。
关键词
LGBT+包容、穆斯林外群体、同性民族主义、反移民态度、调查实验、后分层加权、稳健标准误、西班牙