Original
Experience and self‐interest: Diverging responses to global warming
Abstract
Abstract People are increasingly feeling global warming's effects through extreme heat and natural disasters. How do these climate shocks affect political attitudes? We argue that the effect of climate‐related experiences depends significantly on self‐interest. People in more vulnerable locations are more likely to respond to climate shocks with greater concern and more support for mitigation policy. We test this hypothesis with a macroeconomic model of climate change, geospatial data on climate shocks, and survey data of 148,712 people across 137 countries, and over time with the same 9,500 individuals in the United States. The results show that climate shocks heighten risk perceptions and lead to greater support for mitigation policies only among people in climate‐vulnerable places. This responsiveness to experience is most evident in democratic countries and among people whose livelihoods depend on the weather. Integrating political economy and behavioral theories helps to explain how political attitudes change.
中文
经历与自利:对全球变暖的分化反应
摘要
人们正日益通过极端高温和自然灾害感受到全球变暖的影响。这些气候冲击如何影响政治态度?我们认为,与气候相关的经历所产生的影响在很大程度上取决于自利。生活在更脆弱地区的人更可能对气候冲击作出反应,表现出更大的关切和对减缓政策的更多支持。我们利用气候变化宏观模型、气候冲击的地理空间数据,以及覆盖137个国家148,712人的调查数据,并利用美国同一批9,500人的追踪数据来检验这一假设。结果表明,气候冲击会提高风险感知,并仅在气候脆弱地区的人群中导致对减缓政策的更大支持。这种对经历的反应在民主国家和生计依赖天气的人群中最为明显。整合政治经济学与行为理论有助于解释政治态度如何变化。
关键词
气候变化、政治态度、自利、气候冲击、风险感知、减缓政策、脆弱性、政治经济学