PAR — 2026-03-17
Original Sea‐Level Rise Adaptation and Collaboration in Polycentric Governance: A Comparison of Three Regions
Francesca Vantaggiato, Mark Lubell, Matthew C. Nowlin, Juita‐Elena (Wie) Yusuf, Majid Shafiee‐Jood
PMR — pp. 1-25 2026-03-17 Original Outcome mutability, culpable control, and blame attribution in crisis
Yanwei Li, Hongbo Yu
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of two critical but underdeveloped factors, namely outcome mutability and culpable control, on citizens’ blame towards governments during crises. Based on a pre-registered survey experiment with 1364 Chinese citizens, our analysis shows that citizens assign more blame when they perceive the government as culpable for negative outcomes arising from crises. Additionally, outcome mutability increases citizens’ blame on the government, especially when they believe negative consequences could have been prevented. These findings demonstrate that counterfactual reasoning and causal inference influence citizens’ blame of the government, deepening our understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying it in crises.
PA — 2026-03-16
Original Social Equity Practices in Public Financial Management: A Conceptual Review and Proposed Reforms
John R. Bartle, Philip G. Joyce, Marilyn M. Rubin
PSJ — 2026-03-16
Original Compliance in Regulatory Gray Areas: The Case of the Organic Seed Standard
Liza Wood, Jared Zystro, Kristina Hubbard, Francesca Pia Vantaggiato
JPART 36/3 pp. 378-392 2026-03-15 Original Reversing the accountability chain: how relational power can shape accountability in public encounters
Sara C Closs-Davies, Koen P R Bartels, Doris Merkl-Davies
PSJ — 2026-03-15
Original Can Money Buy Trust? Social Transfers and Trust During the Covid‐19 Pandemic
GOV 39/2 2026-03-15
Original Beyond Democratic Backsliding: Bureaucracy, Elite Dynamics and Administrative Change in Authoritarian Transitions
Kutsal Yesilkagit, Johan Christensen
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper examines how political and administrative elites shape regime transformations under authoritarian rule, proposing an elite‐centered analytical perspective that complements prevailing accounts of “democratic backsliding.” We show how embedding political–administrative relations within a broader elite‐theoretical framework clarifies the mechanisms through which elite reconfiguration underwrites institutional erosion. Drawing on classical and contemporary elite theory, we argue that shifts in elite coalitions among politicians, bureaucrats, and economic actors drive regime changes more than institutional erosion or ideological movements. Through comparative historical analysis of interwar Italy and Germany, we illustrate distinct elite‐driven pathways to authoritarian consolidation: Mussolini's Italy involved strategic alliances with traditional elites, while Hitler's Germany pursued radical elite replacement. Our findings highlight the critical role of elite realignments in transforming institutions and economic policies, often maintaining a façade of electoral legitimacy. This elite‐theoretical approach offers nuanced insights into contemporary shifts toward autocratic governance, emphasizing the importance of analyzing elite networks and interactions to comprehend the deeper mechanics of political transformation. Our findings thus contribute to public administration scholarship by theorizing how elite realignments transform bureaucratic structures and alter the nature of political‐administrative relationships under authoritarian conditions.
JOP — 2026-03-13
Original Rethinking Reputation: When Fighting to Demonstrate Resolve Backfires
Joshua A. Schwartz
Abstract
(原文未提供摘要)
中文 重新审视声誉:当为展示决心而成的斗争反噬自身
Joshua A. Schwartz
摘要
原文未提供摘要
关键词
声誉、决心、危机谈判、威慑、观众成本
DOI: 10.1086/741344
查看原文 →
PMR — pp. 1-29 2026-03-13 Original Local civil servants and democratic innovations: do role conceptions matter for the assessment of participatory decision-making instruments?
Willem Goutry, Tessa Haesevoets, Kristof Steyvers, Bram Verschuere
PAR 86/4 pp. 891-900 2026-03-12 Original Updating Tocqueville's Remedies Against Democratic Despotism: Civic Engagement, Local Self‐Governance, and Public Administration